Summary: (12/31/21) Thanks to all who took the time to watch the video I posted last week and who gave me comments and suggestions on how to improve it to fit your needs. The comments all made sense to me: make them shorter (1-3 minutes), more casual and conversational, more energy, more charts, and did I mention shorter? The video below is my second attempt. Disclosure—I made it before I received comments on the first one so it’s still too long (7 minutes). I promise the next one will be be much shorter and reflect your suggested changes. As always, comments welcome.
In this second video, I explain the mechanism through which inflation is transmitted to stock prices, bond prices, and interest rates and what you can do as an investor to restructure your portfolio to be more inflation-resistant. The key is to recognize that the annual rate of increase in real asset prices is simply the capital gains component of the total return on real assets that investors compare with the total return on financial assets when deciding how to allocate their net worth pie across asset classes.
This notion reflects my observation that the most important economic events almost always originate in the economy’s balance sheet, that measures what we own and what we owe at a moment of time, rather than in the economy’s GDP accounts that measure the flow of work over a period of time. There are two reasons for this. First, the balance sheet is huge—$400 trillion according to the most recent Fed Z1 report—nearly 20x this year’s GDP. A material disturbance in the economy’s balance sheet, say, a change in what people want to own, triggers a multi-trillion dollar tsunami of rebalancing activity that affects the prices of all assets and liabilities. It also drives changes in net worth like the ones that drove a wedge between the fortunes of people who make their living in the asset economy and those who make their living in the paycheck economy.
The second reason the balance sheet is so important is because it has an Achilles Heel. As Friedrich von Hayek told us almost a century ago in Economics and Knowledge (1936), and in The Use of Knowledge in Society (1945), markets are extraordinarily efficient communication networks that use price signals to allow people to coordinate plans and allocate resources to where they are needed. But asset markets also freeze up from time to time in periods of non-price credit rationing we call financial crises. Ironically, recent work in network theory shows that these cascading network failures are features of the same network architecture that makes financial markets so efficient. I will write about how investors can understand and protect capital from financial crises in a later post.
In the next video, I will discuss the timing and sector-specific economics of different real asset categories. As always, I welcome your comments and advice. And feel free to share with anyone you would like to be part of our conversation. Subscriptions are, and always will be, free. My objective is merely to stimulate discussion of these ideas among interesting people.
Dr. John
Dr. Rutledge,
Your takeaway of a rising price environment for real assets despite nominal increases in interest rates forthcoming reminds me of Dr. Linneman's Fall 2020 newsletter (you can see it here https://getrefm.com/if-interest-rates-determine-cap-rates-where-is-the-evidence/ ) that the conventional wisdom of real asset cap rates following interest rates (i.e. rising interest rates = rising cap rates = lower real asset prices) is wholly wrong, and all that really matters is allocations of capital. It is a thorough empirical study which supports your general thesis of upcoming rising real asset prices and, more importantly, highlights that when large changes in capital allocation are occurring, things such as minor increases in interest rates or unemployment are almost meaningless.
Thank you for the newsletter and looking forward to the upcoming sector-specific insight!
Dylan